From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59791) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UV3FA-0000xA-UB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:12:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UV3F6-0007zm-41 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:12:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UV3F5-0007zE-Rz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:12:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:12:00 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20130424131200.58ef0458@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5178053A.1000102@redhat.com> References: <5178053A.1000102@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/12] covert savevm, loadvm and delvm into qapi List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Pavel Hrdina , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:15:54 -0600 Eric Blake wrote: > > This patch series introduces new design of these commands: > > At this point, we've missed soft freeze. Is this something we are still > trying to get into 1.5, or is it okay to slip it to 1.6 where we can > feel more comfortable about having a solid review in place? Ultimately, > it's the maintainer's call, but I'm personally leaning towards deferring > - libvirt has survived with HMP savevm long enough that another qemu > release without QMP savevm won't be the end of the world. I'm also > hoping that the final product is clean enough that a distro could feel > comfortable with the idea of rebasing to 1.5 while still backporting the > QMP commands that go into 1.6. I prefer to wait for 1.6 too.