From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44277)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1UXrme-0000dt-S2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 07:34:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1UXrmb-0003z7-Nz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 07:34:44 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16904)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1UXrmb-0003yT-HR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 07:34:41 -0400
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r42BYdw0025994
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 07:34:40 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 14:34:30 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130502113430.GA24681@redhat.com>
References: <1367487519-17332-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<20130502103540.GA23474@redhat.com> <51824780.5090107@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51824780.5090107@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.5 0/3] qdev: switch reset to post-order
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 02/05/2013 12:35, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > > I was going to keep these for 1.6, but since they have been tested
> > > by the user and myself, and they fix a regression, it can be worthwhile
> > > to include these in 1.5.
> > 
> > I remember there were some tricky issues last time
> > we tried something like this for PCI.
> 
> PCI is already post-order though, isn't it?

For example, it resets the irq count before.
I really don't know why, and the reverse looks more
correct but let's tread carefully for 1.5.
For 1.6 maybe we'll be able to finally get rid
of the irq count.

> > Let's find an LSI specific solution for 1.5 please.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> Paolo