From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37434)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1UXuPZ-0001gi-Hn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:23:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1UXuPV-0004LO-Ut
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:23:05 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24980)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1UXuPV-0004L5-Mu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:23:01 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 17:22:49 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130502142249.GB12954@redhat.com>
References: <20130502135143.GA1171@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_Jm8sgQnNMrrz5H1B1KAgrtiaDm3Br_qbfyFO_D-a+rA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130502141704.GA12954@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA88=RPu-1w5ZxLOE5nKF_xLAB4mX7x1fa6w_VpmoBJ3Sw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA88=RPu-1w5ZxLOE5nKF_xLAB4mX7x1fa6w_VpmoBJ3Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] posting patches in pull requests (was Re: [PATCH
 08/29] cpu: Add qemu_for_each_cpu())
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:21:14PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 May 2013 15:17, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:09:04PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> 
> > Sometimes I'm Cc'd on 1 patch out of series.
> > I might not want to go dig out the series only
> > to check if it actually needs review.
> 
> I think cc'ing somebody on half a pullrequest or series is
> a bit odd, personally.
> 
> >> I don't particularly object to suggesting that pullreq
> >> patches are all tagged 'PULL'; I don't think it's very
> >> likely that you'll get 100% consistency out of everybody
> >> though.
> 
> > As there's one person that does the merges, it's pretty
> > easy to get consistency.
> 
> Every submaintainer sends pullrequests, so there's a
> relatively large body of people sending these emails.
> 
> -- PMM

Well everyone used to send requests without patches.
We managed to change that we can change the format too :)