From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47195) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXv0L-0003aP-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 11:01:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXv0K-00011n-CK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 11:01:05 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]:54367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXv0K-00011Q-66 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 11:01:04 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x43so535837wey.25 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 08:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 17:01:00 +0200 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20130502150100.GA4478@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <20130502135143.GA1171@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130502135143.GA1171@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] posting patches in pull requests (was Re: [PATCH 08/29] cpu: Add qemu_for_each_cpu()) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:51:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Anthony, can we please make it a rule that > all patches in pull request are tagged specially? > > As it is, patchwork is full of patches that were already reviewed and > merged, all my scripts that were filtering and sorting patches are also > useless, and I get to wade through each patch for the second time. > > Maybe you could teach your scripts to ignore [PULL X/Y] where X>0? > > This way people could tag all resent patches > as PULL. > > Further, > PULL 0/2 > PULL 1/2 > PULL 2/2 > > aligns better than > > PULL 0/2 > PATCH 1/2 > PATCH 2/2 Seems like a nice idea. I'm also occassionally hit by a stray PATCH email that's actually part of a larger pull request. Stefan