From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] net: introduce command to query rx-filter information
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 09:08:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130524090834.41dd9108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519F6350.1040502@redhat.com>
On Fri, 24 May 2013 06:55:44 -0600
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 06:23 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> I don't think we need this argument. This command is quite simple in its
> >>> response, let's do this filtering in HMP only.
> >>
> >> Event message contains the net client name, management might only want
> >> to query the single net client.
> >
> > The client can do the filtering itself.
>
> If we're arguing that we want this to be as responsive as possible, then
> the less data we send over the wire, the faster management can react to
> the guest's request for a particular NIC. That is, if libvirt is
> listening to events that says NIC2 wants to change rx-filter, libvirt
> would rather do a filtered query where it knows the JSON array of 1
> element matches NIC2 data, rather than do a global query and search
> through the returned array until it finds NIC2.
This sounds like premature optimization to me, but I wonder if instead
of cluttering commands with arguments to do the filtering we could add
some standard way of doing this in the QAPI.
It was you who suggested a filter command?
> Filtering is relatively easy to add, whether you do it in QMP or make
> every client add it. Libvirt will survive if you don't have filtering,
> but I don't see why we can't have it in QMP. Also, if you DO decide to
> rip filtering out of QMP, you STILL need to keep a per-NIC flag. Since
> the events say which NIC is requesting a change, even if the query reads
> all nics, libvirt will only change the macvtap settings of the nic(s)
> for which it has received an event (it doesn't make sense to waste time
> requesting a (no-op) change to macvtap settings on a nic that hasn't
> requested a change). But if you argue that having no filtering in the
> QMP command means that you can get away with a single flag instead of a
> per-nic flag, then you will fail to emit an event for NIC2 if it changes
> in between the time that NIC1 fired an event and libvirt finally does
> the query, and libvirt wouldn't realize that NIC2 also needs a macvtap
> change.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-24 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-23 9:07 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] mac programming over macvtap Amos Kong
2013-05-23 9:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] net: introduce RX_FILTER_CHANGED event Amos Kong
2013-05-23 10:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-23 14:28 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-23 14:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-23 14:52 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-23 14:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-23 15:33 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-24 3:20 ` Amos Kong
2013-05-23 12:01 ` Eric Blake
2013-06-26 6:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-06-26 13:53 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-23 9:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] net: introduce command to query rx-filter information Amos Kong
2013-05-23 10:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 4:53 ` Amos Kong
2013-05-23 12:14 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-24 3:03 ` Amos Kong
2013-06-26 7:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-05-23 16:03 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-24 3:08 ` Amos Kong
2013-05-24 12:23 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-24 12:55 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-24 13:08 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2013-05-24 13:23 ` Eric Blake
2013-06-26 9:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-05-24 15:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-05-24 16:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-24 18:05 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-24 20:00 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-26 7:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-27 8:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-06-26 9:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-06-26 12:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-06-26 14:02 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-06-26 14:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-06-28 14:04 ` Eric Blake
2013-06-28 17:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-07-01 3:24 ` Amos Kong
2013-07-02 6:33 ` Amos Kong
2013-07-02 9:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-07-02 10:40 ` Amos Kong
2013-07-02 13:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-07-04 3:31 ` Amos Kong
2013-07-04 6:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-07-11 14:05 ` Amos Kong
2013-07-12 6:32 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-07-12 7:07 ` Amos Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130524090834.41dd9108@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).