From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, s.priebe@profihost.ag,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] monitor: work around delayed CHR_EVENT_OPENED events
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 11:24:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130527112450.12eba408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369582419-28205-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sun, 26 May 2013 10:33:39 -0500
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> In the past, CHR_EVENT_OPENED events were emitted via a pre-expired
> QEMUTimer. Due to timers being processing at the tail end of each main
> loop iteration, this generally meant that such events would be emitted
> within the same main loop iteration, prior any client data being read
> by tcp/unix socket server backends.
>
> With 9f939df955a4152aad69a19a77e0898631bb2c18, this was switched to
> a "bottom-half" that is registered via g_idle_add(). This makes it
> likely that the event won't be sent until a subsequent iteration, and
> also adds the possibility that such events will race with the
> processing of client data.
>
> In cases where we rely on the CHR_EVENT_OPENED event being delivered
> prior to any client data being read, this may cause unexpected behavior.
>
> In the case of a QMP monitor session using a socket backend, the delayed
> processing of the CHR_EVENT_OPENED event can lead to a situation where
> a previous session, where 'qmp_capabilities' has already processed, can
> cause the rejection of 'qmp_capabilities' for a subsequent session,
> since we reset capabilities in response to CHR_EVENT_OPENED, which may
> not yet have been delivered. This can be reproduced with the following
> command, generally within 50 or so iterations:
>
> mdroth@loki:~$ cat cmds
> {'execute':'qmp_capabilities'}
> {'execute':'query-cpus'}
> mdroth@loki:~$ while true; do if socat stdio unix-connect:/tmp/qmp.sock
> <cmds | grep CommandNotFound &>/dev/null; then echo failed; break; else
> echo ok; fi; done;
> ok
> ok
> failed
> mdroth@loki:~$
>
> As a work-around, we reset capabilities as part of the CHR_EVENT_CLOSED
> hook, which gets called as part of the GIOChannel cb associated with the
> client rather than a bottom-half, and is thus guaranteed to be delivered
> prior to accepting any subsequent client sessions.
>
> This does not address the more general problem of whether or not there
> are chardev users that rely on CHR_EVENT_OPENED being delivered prior to
> client data, and whether or not we should consider moving CHR_EVENT_OPENED
> "in-band" with connection establishment as a general solution, but fixes
> QMP for the time being.
>
> Reported-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks for debugging this Michael. I'm going to apply your patch to the qmp
branch because we can't let this broken (esp. in -stable) but this is papering
over the real bug...
> ---
> v1->v2:
> * remove command_mode reset from CHR_EVENT_OPENED case, since this
> might still cause a race
>
> monitor.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 6ce2a4e..f1953a0 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -4649,7 +4649,6 @@ static void monitor_control_event(void *opaque, int event)
>
> switch (event) {
> case CHR_EVENT_OPENED:
> - mon->mc->command_mode = 0;
> data = get_qmp_greeting();
> monitor_json_emitter(mon, data);
> qobject_decref(data);
> @@ -4660,6 +4659,7 @@ static void monitor_control_event(void *opaque, int event)
> json_message_parser_init(&mon->mc->parser, handle_qmp_command);
> mon_refcount--;
> monitor_fdsets_cleanup();
> + mon->mc->command_mode = 0;
> break;
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-27 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-26 15:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] monitor: work around delayed CHR_EVENT_OPENED events Michael Roth
2013-05-27 15:24 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2013-05-27 16:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-05-27 17:59 ` mdroth
2013-05-29 17:27 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-29 21:03 ` mdroth
2013-05-29 22:29 ` mdroth
2013-05-30 6:58 ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130527112450.12eba408@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).