From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37283) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhFdv-0002v5-8X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 04:52:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhFdm-00023i-Oo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 04:52:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhFdm-00023d-Hu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 04:52:22 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4S8qLeY014353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 04:52:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 16:52:19 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20130528085219.GB16648@localhost.nay.redhat.com> References: <1369373827-9152-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <20130524080748.GI4515@redhat.com> <20130527022521.GA27700@localhost.nay.redhat.com> <20130527115720.GW4515@redhat.com> <20130528073049.GA10192@localhost.nay.redhat.com> <20130528074759.GC4515@redhat.com> <20130528084614.GA4889@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130528084614.GA4889@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/12] curl: fix curl read List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Richard W.M. Jones" Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com On Tue, 05/28 09:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:47:59AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'm not sure if a Windows guest is somehow necessary to show the > > errors. I'll retest with a Linux guest and get back to you about > > that. > > Reproducible with Linux guest (remotely over slow Wifi). > > > Also I'm testing against a remote Apache2 server over a very slow Wifi > > connection. Whereas your test was against localhost. Again, I will > > test this scenario to see if that makes a difference and get back to > > you. > > NOT reproducible with Windows XP guest over localhost, Apache2 server. > > So it seems to have something to do with the long latency and/or low > bandwidth of the slow wifi connection here. > > I will add: This bug is not 100% reproducible on every run. However > it does occur very frequently, probably in 9 out of 10 runs for me. > > Rich. > OK, I'll try a remote image then. -- Fam