From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhGFN-0003Xf-Sx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 05:31:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhGFH-0006l5-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 05:31:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhGFG-0006kx-RL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 05:31:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:31:03 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20130528113103.211d92d9@nial.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1369686235-11090-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> References: <1369686235-11090-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 0/3] Conroe/Penryn/Nehalem CPUID family/level fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov , Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?B?RuRyYmVy?= On Mon, 27 May 2013 17:23:52 -0300 Eduardo Habkost wrote: > This series changes the CPUID family and level fields of the Conroe, Penryn, and > Nehalem CPU models. > > Testing: those model/level values have been in use on Red Hat > Enterprise Linux since version 6.0 (released in 2010). The fix wasn't > submitted to QEMU earlier because we didn't have a good mechanism and > clear procedure to update CPUID values of existing CPU models in QEMU. > > Eduardo Habkost (3): > pc: create pc-*-1.6 machine-types > target-i386: update model values on Conroe/Penryn/Nehalem CPU models > target-i386: set level=4 on Conroe/Penryn/Nehalem > > hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- > hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > target-i386/cpu.c | 12 ++++++------ > 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > Reviewed-By: Igor Mammedov