From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51289) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhhTa-0005nZ-6l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:35:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhhTV-0005jC-JW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:35:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:35:27 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20130529163527.54680385@nial.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51A5F4BF.90504@redhat.com> References: <1369827271-20921-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <51A5F06A.4040109@suse.de> <51A5F4BF.90504@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] xen_machine_pv: do not create a dummy CPU in machine->init List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Stefano Stabellini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, anthony.perard@citrix.com, Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?B?RuRyYmVy?= On Wed, 29 May 2013 14:29:51 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 29/05/2013 14:11, Andreas F=E4rber ha scritto: > >> xen_machine_pv uses cpu_x86_init, therefore it has been broken. > >> > >> This patch fixes the problem by removing the dummy CPU creation > >> altogether from xen_init_pv, relying on the fact that QEMU can now cope > >> with a machine without an emulated CPU. > >> > >> This fix should be backported to QEMU 1.5. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > >> CC: imammedo@redhat.com > >> CC: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > >=20 > > Change looks okay, > >=20 > > Reviewed-by: Andreas F=E4rber > >=20 > > But for the future please avoid "this patch" in the commit message > > (because later on it's a "commit", not a patch) and also please put > > additional notices such as for backporting below the --- line. >=20 > I read it as a warning to backporters that the patch, even though it may > apply, was not tested and may even be wrong in 1.4. it only needs to be backported to 1.5, 1.4 is not affected. >=20 > Paolo >=20