From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57179) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiQ7c-0003l4-OC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 10:16:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiQ7W-0004Oy-Ou for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 10:16:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UiQ7W-0004Ot-4r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2013 10:15:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:19:32 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20130531091932.61d4cc03@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51A89FCA.5080707@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1369451385-23452-1-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130527154139.GH2373@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> <51A6BC41.7090803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51A89FCA.5080707@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/4] qapi and snapshot code clean up in block layer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wenchao Xia Cc: Kevin Wolf , phrdina@redhat.com, stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:04:10 +0800 Wenchao Xia wrote: > =E4=BA=8E 2013-5-30 10:41, Wenchao Xia =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > > =E4=BA=8E 2013-5-27 23:41, Kevin Wolf =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > >> Am 25.05.2013 um 05:09 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben: > >>> These patches are the common part of my hmp/qmp block query series > >>> and Pavel's > >>> qmp snapshot command converion series. It mainly does following thing= s: > >>> 1 move snapshot related code to block/snapshot.c, qmp and info > >>> dumping code to > >>> block/qapi.c. > >>> 2 better info dumping function to get rid of buffer, avoid string > >>> truncation. > >> > >> Posted comments on patch 1 and 4. > >> > >> Patches 2 and 3 are: > >> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf > >> > > It seems nothing need change, Kevin, do you think it can be merged? > > > This serial blocks mine and Pavel's work, anything need to be > improved? Respin with > -typedef int (*fprintf_function)(FILE *f, const char *fmt, ...) > +typedef int (*fprintf_function)(void *out, const char *fmt, ...) > ? As far as my review is concerned, I'm OK with your current version.