From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYdq-0002xw-9r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:34:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYdo-0002Yg-Lk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:33:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYdo-0002YT-DU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:33:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:33:49 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20130603133349.712bc794@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51ACD16A.7020305@redhat.com> References: <1370279823-18752-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1370279823-18752-3-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <51ACD16A.7020305@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: split Monitor (QMP/HMP) entry List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:24:58 -0600 Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/03/2013 11:17 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > This entry doesn't reflect reality for a few years now. This commit > > splits it into Human Monitor (HMP), QAPI and QMP. Markus is dropped > > as a maintainer. > > > > This is what we have been for the last few years. Also, it's going > > to help me to offload some of this work to someone else in the near > > future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 17 +++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > QAPI Schema > > M: Eric Blake > > M: Luiz Capitulino > > @@ -713,6 +719,13 @@ M: Markus Armbruster > > S: Supported > > F: qapi-schema.json > > > > +QMP > > +M: Luiz Capitulino > > +S: Supported > > +F: qmp.c > > +F: monitor.c > > +F: qmp-commands.hx > > Do we want QMP/* lumped into this category? For that matter, should > QMP/qmp-events.txt be included as part of QAPI Schema? Yes, for both questions. I've fixed it for v2, but I didn't include QMP/qmp-events.txt in the QAPI Schema entry cause it would be a bit confusing. We should move the events to the schema file soon, anyway.