From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50248)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1UosEI-0003q2-J4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:29:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1UosEH-0000bj-G3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:29:34 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:58288)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1UosEH-0000bf-A3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:29:33 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ey16so4957673wid.5
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:29:29 +0200
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130618092929.GA7649@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
References: <1371203313-26490-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<1371203313-26490-9-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<51BB24B0.9070503@redhat.com>
	<20130617145757.GA31444@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
	<51BF2530.2010101@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51BF2530.2010101@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 08/13] block: drop bdrv_get_aio_context()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Ping Fan Liu <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 05:03:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 17/06/2013 16:57, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:12:00AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 14/06/2013 05:48, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> > I guess then
> > it comes down to robustness if a hung NFS mount can affect the entire VM
> > instead of just hanging an emulated disk device.
> 
> That would only be a hung NFS mount while running something that drains
> a BDS, no?  It would hang the monitor, but it wouldn't be a regression
> compared to what we have now obviously.

Yes, no regression from what we have today.

Stefan