From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UovNV-0005tb-Dx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:51:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UovNR-0007Bx-BL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:51:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35202) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UovNR-0007Br-3i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:51:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:51:58 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20130618125158.GA23792@redhat.com> References: <1371554221-5762-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> <51C054A6.70308@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51C054A6.70308@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Remove hardcoded xen-platform device initialization (v4) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Paul Durrant , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:37:58PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Hi Paul, > > (xen-devel snipped) > > On 06/18/13 13:16, Paul Durrant wrote: > > Because of concerns over backwards compatibility and a suggestion that > > xenfv should be retired in favour of using the pc machine type I have re- > > worked my original patch into 2 patches: > > > > [PATCH 1/2] Allow use of pc machine type (accel=xen) for Xen HVM > > [PATCH 2/2] Move hardcoded initialization of xen-platform device. > > > > Application of both these patches allows alternative pc machine types to be > > used with the accel=xen option, but preserves the hardcoded creation of > > the xen-platform device only for machine type xenfv. > > > > v3: > > - Add test for xen_enabled() that went missing in v2 > > > > v4: > > - Remove erroneous whitespace hunk > > - Replace hw_error() with fprintf()+exit(1) > > - Add braces to single-line if > > can you please offer an opinion in the > > [PATCH 1/2] pvpanic: initialization cleanup > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/216940 > > thread? > > >From where I stand (which is "quite afar" :)) this series of yours seems > somewhat related to my doubt there. > > Thanks! > Laszlo OK will make it skip fwcfg as we did earlier. Thanks for the review. -- MST