From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Liu Ping Fan <qemulist@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] QEMUBH: make AioContext's bh re-entrant
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:39:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620073924.GA14255@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371675569-6516-3-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:59:29AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> BH will be used outside big lock, so introduce lock to protect
> between the writers, ie, bh's adders and deleter. The lock only
> affects the writers and bh's callback does not take this extra lock.
> Note that for the same AioContext, aio_bh_poll() can not run in
> parallel yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> async.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/block/aio.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
qemu_bh_cancel() and qemu_bh_delete() are not modified by this patch.
It seems that calling them from a thread is a little risky because there
is no guarantee that the BH is no longer invoked after a thread calls
these functions.
I think that's worth a comment or do you want them to take the lock so
they become safe?
The other thing I'm unclear on is the ->idle assignment followed
immediately by a ->scheduled assignment. Without memory barriers
aio_bh_poll() isn't guaranteed to get an ordered view of these updates:
it may see an idle BH as a regular scheduled BH because ->idle is still
0.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 20:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] QEMUBH: make AioContext's bh re-entrant Liu Ping Fan
2013-06-19 20:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] add a header file for atomic operations Liu Ping Fan
2013-06-19 16:37 ` Richard Henderson
2013-06-19 16:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-19 20:39 ` Torvald Riegel
2013-06-19 20:44 ` Richard Henderson
2013-06-20 8:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-19 20:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] QEMUBH: make AioContext's bh re-entrant Liu Ping Fan
2013-06-20 7:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2013-06-20 8:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-20 9:12 ` liu ping fan
2013-06-20 9:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-20 9:41 ` liu ping fan
2013-06-20 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-21 4:35 ` liu ping fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130620073924.GA14255@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemulist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).