From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] iscsi: add support for bdrv_co_is_allocated()
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:14:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130621131415.GG2986@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C43C17.3040103@kamp.de>
Am 21.06.2013 um 13:42 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> Am 21.06.2013 13:07, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> > Am 21.06.2013 um 11:45 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> >> Am 21.06.2013 11:18, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> >>> Am 20.06.2013 um 20:20 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> block/iscsi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c
> >>>> index 0bbf0b1..e6b966d 100644
> >>>> --- a/block/iscsi.c
> >>>> +++ b/block/iscsi.c
> >>>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ typedef struct IscsiLun {
> >>>> uint64_t num_blocks;
> >>>> int events;
> >>>> QEMUTimer *nop_timer;
> >>>> + uint8_t lbpme;
> >>>> } IscsiLun;
> >>>>
> >>>> typedef struct IscsiAIOCB {
> >>>> @@ -800,6 +801,60 @@ iscsi_getlength(BlockDriverState *bs)
> >>>> return len;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> +static int coroutine_fn iscsi_co_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >>>> + int64_t sector_num,
> >>>> + int nb_sectors, int *pnum)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + IscsiLun *iscsilun = bs->opaque;
> >>>> + struct scsi_task *task = NULL;
> >>>> + struct scsi_get_lba_status *lbas = NULL;
> >>>> + struct scsi_lba_status_descriptor *lbasd = NULL;
> >>>> + int ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + *pnum = nb_sectors;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (iscsilun->lbpme == 0) {
> >>>> + return 1;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* in-flight requests could invalidate the lba status result */
> >>>> + while (iscsi_process_flush(iscsilun)) {
> >>>> + qemu_aio_wait();
> >>>> + }
> >>> Note that you're blocking here. The preferred way would be something
> >>> involving a yield from the coroutine and a reenter as soon as all
> >>> requests are done. Maybe a CoRwLock does what you need?
> >> Is there a document how to use it? Or can you help here?
> > The idea would be to take a read lock while any request is in flight
> > (i.e. qemu_co_rwlock_rdlock() before it's started and
> > qemu_co_rwlock_unlock() when it completes), and to take a write lock
> > (qemu_co_rwlock_wrlock) for the part of iscsi_co_is_allocated() that
> > requires that no other request runs in parallel.
> Wouldn't this require that all the other operations in iscsi.c would
> also take these lock? Currently there are only aio requests
> implemented as it seems.
Hm, okay, that makes it a bit harder because AIO callbacks aren't called
in coroutine context. So taking the lock would be easy, but releasing
them could turn out somewhat tricky.
> Would it help here to add sth like this?
>
> while (iscsi_process_flush(iscsilun)) {
> if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
> qemu_coroutine_yield();
> } else {
> qemu_aio_wait();
> }
> }
You're always in a coroutine here.
The problem is that if you yield, you need to reenter the coroutine at
some point or the is_allocated request would never complete. That's
basically what the coroutine locks do for you: They yield and only
reenter when the lock can be taken.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 18:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] iscsi: support for is_allocated and inproved has_zero_init Peter Lieven
2013-06-20 18:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] iscsi: add support for bdrv_co_is_allocated() Peter Lieven
2013-06-21 9:18 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-06-21 9:45 ` Peter Lieven
2013-06-21 11:07 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-06-21 11:42 ` Peter Lieven
2013-06-21 13:14 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2013-06-21 13:23 ` Peter Lieven
2013-06-21 16:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-21 17:06 ` Peter Lieven
2013-06-21 17:13 ` ronnie sahlberg
2013-06-21 17:18 ` Peter Lieven
2013-06-21 16:06 ` ronnie sahlberg
2013-06-21 20:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-24 8:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-06-24 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-24 16:11 ` Peter Lieven
2013-06-20 18:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] iscsi: add intelligent has_zero_init check Peter Lieven
2013-06-21 20:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-21 20:25 ` Peter Lieven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-20 18:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] iscsi: support for is_allocated and inproved has_zero_init Peter Lieven
2013-06-20 18:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] iscsi: add support for bdrv_co_is_allocated() Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130621131415.GG2986@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).