From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
qemu-trivial@nongnu.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RFC kvm irqfd: add directly mapped MSI IRQ support
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:35:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130624163549.GA8351@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hagnhbsz.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 08:34:52AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 07:32:32AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> This should be a per-device mapping, yes. But I'm not sure that VCPUs
> >> should even see anything. I don't think a VCPU can generate an MSI
> >> interrupt by writing to this location.
> >>
> > No, and lower 4k of this space is where APIC is mapped as seen from CPU.
> >> Is there anything that prevents us from using IRQFDs corresponding to
> >> the target of an MSI mapping and get rid of the MSI info in the kernel?
> >>
> > Again, you assume that x86 has some pin that MSI triggers. This is not
> > the case; address/data is minimum that is needed to inject interrupt
> > there (or moving APIC into userspace, since this is where "translation"
> > is happening).
>
> An APIC message contains:
>
> 1) Destination Mode
> 2) Delivery mode
> 3) Level
> 4) Trigger mode
> 5) Vector
> 6) Destination
>
> Which is more or less what the MSI addr/data pair encodes.
>
Not if interrupt remapping is in use.
> But we can certainly have a userspace interface to inject such a message
> into the LAPICs. In fact, this is more or less what KVM_SIGNAL_MSI is
> doing except that it's called MSI and encodes things in an addr/pair.
>
Good that it does that otherwise it would have been broken after
interrupt remapping implementation.
> Such an interface would also allow for a QEMU implementation of an IO
> APIC while still having the in-kernel LAPIC.
>
Yes.
> It would also allow QEMU to do per-device MSI decoding.
>
Why can't it be done now with existing interfaces?
> Isn't this more or less what Avi's previous proposal was around changing
> the APIC interfaces to userspace?
>
Avi actually was against adding KVM_SIGNAL_MSI initially since it
duplicated the functionality we already had. Don't remember how Jan
managed to persuade him in the end :)
--
Gleb.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-24 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 14:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RFC kvm irqfd: add directly mapped MSI IRQ support Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-20 15:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-20 16:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-20 23:51 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-23 14:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-23 15:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-23 21:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-23 21:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-24 4:46 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-24 12:24 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-24 12:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-23 21:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-24 12:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-20 16:51 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-21 1:56 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-21 2:34 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-21 2:49 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-21 4:46 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-21 5:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-21 6:03 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-21 6:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-21 6:40 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-23 15:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-24 4:44 ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-24 12:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-24 7:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-24 12:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-24 12:37 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-24 13:06 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-24 13:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-24 13:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-24 14:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-24 14:34 ` Alexander Graf
2013-06-24 15:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-06-24 16:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-24 16:35 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130624163549.GA8351@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).