From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UufLq-0004MA-0A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 04:57:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UufLo-0005Uz-Fq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 04:57:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::22c]:38608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UufLo-0005Ul-8J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 04:57:16 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q10so632151eaj.3 for ; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 01:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 10:57:12 +0200 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20130704085712.GD2945@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] best way to provide disk storage for vm without shared storage system List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vasiliy Tolstov Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com, libvirt-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:31:44PM +0400, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > Now i provide ext4 fs for qcow2 images (raid1 with two sata disks). > Now i don't need live migration (but may need it in feature). > What is the best way to provide disks to vm in case of performance, > ability to create backups (i don't want lvm snapshots)? > > As i search from google more speed can take physical storage - lvm. > But may be QED or FVD can provide near lvm performance to me? "Best" really depends. If you don't want to use LVM you could use raw image files (fast) and perform backups inside the guest just like on a physical machine. qcow2 has pretty good performance nowadays. If you care about performance then benchmark your workload to decide which configuration best. There is no single answer because it depends on your workload and additional constraints (like no LVM). Stefan