From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49375)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1Uuita-0008Mo-KY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:44:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1UuitZ-0007v9-7L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:44:22 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22b]:52525)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1UuitZ-0007up-0Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:44:21 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l10so753898eei.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 05:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:44:09 +0200
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130704124409.GD4213@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
References: <1372300908-7546-1-git-send-email-xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<51D383CA.6050808@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51D383CA.6050808@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/9] add internal snapshot support at
 block device level
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, phrdina@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, dietmar@proxmox.com

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:52:10AM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
>   Any comments for this version?

I'm happy with the code and left comments on error messages and
documentation.