From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51559)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1UwfOb-0007la-TW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:24:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1UwfOa-0000Ft-R5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:24:25 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23409)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1UwfOa-0000Fk-Cw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:24:24 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:24:06 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130709212405.GA2316@amt.cnet>
References: <20121212213631.GA27694@amt.cnet> <51384EED.5020709@redhat.com>
	<20130308171151.GA29630@amt.cnet> <87r4jpvkv1.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
	<513ACC44.5090805@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <513ACC44.5090805@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RTC: enable lost_tick_policy=slew as
	default (v2)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:44:36AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 08/03/2013 18:53, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> >> Anthony mentioned that this
> >>
> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/160699
> >>
> >> Is the proper way to do it.
> > 
> > That breaks too.  I don't have a solution but I also don't remember what
> > the exact failures are.
> 
> What about a more generic version of that?  Adding a priority field to
> global properties, so that -global can have a higher priority than the
> default (used by machine types)?
> 
> Paolo

What exactly is the problem with

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg01733.html

Again? Should it just be resubmitted ?