From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
lcapitulino@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 09/11] Implement qdict_flatten()
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:59:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130716085908.GD2387@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DF14CC.9000609@redhat.com>
Am 11.07.2013 um 22:25 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 07/09/2013 03:53 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Worth repeating this comment from the code into the commit message?
>
> > + * qdict_flatten(): For each nested QDict with key x, all fields with
> key y
> > + * are moved to this QDict and their key is renamed to "x.y".
>
> Otherwise, I had to read nearly the entire patch to learn what I was
> supposed to be reviewing.
Okay, will do that.
> > +static void qdict_do_flatten(QDict *qdict, QDict *target, const char *prefix)
> > +{
> > + QObject *value;
> > + const QDictEntry *entry, *next;
> > + const char *new_key;
> > + bool delete;
> > +
> > + entry = qdict_first(qdict);
> > +
> > + while (entry != NULL) {
> > +
> > + next = qdict_next(qdict, entry);
> > + value = qdict_entry_value(entry);
> > + new_key = NULL;
> > + delete = false;
> > +
> > + if (prefix) {
> > + qobject_incref(value);
> > + new_key = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", prefix, entry->key);
> > + qdict_put_obj(target, new_key, value);
>
> You are calling this function with the same parameter for both qdict and
> target. Doesn't that mean you are modifying qdict while iterating it?
> Is that safe? [/me re-reads] - oh, you recursively call this function,
> and this modification of target happens _only_ if prefix is non-null,
> which happens only:
>
> > + delete = true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (qobject_type(value) == QTYPE_QDICT) {
> > + qdict_do_flatten(qobject_to_qdict(value), target,
> > + new_key ? new_key : entry->key);
>
> when passing two different dicts into the function. Maybe add an
> assert(!prefix || qdict != target).
Your point still stands: The recursively called function modifies target
(which is qdict on the top level) by adding new keys. I guess when it
returns I need to restart the loop from the beginning in order to be
safe.
Kevin
> > + delete = true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (delete) {
> > + qdict_del(qdict, entry->key);
> > + }
> > +
> > + entry = next;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * qdict_flatten(): For each nested QDict with key x, all fields with key y
> > + * are moved to this QDict and their key is renamed to "x.y".
> > + */
> > +void qdict_flatten(QObject *obj)
> > +{
> > + QDict *qdict = qobject_to_qdict(obj);
> > + qdict_do_flatten(qdict, qdict, NULL);
> > +}
> >
>
> --
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-09 9:53 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] qapi changes in preparation for blockdev-add Kevin Wolf
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/11] qapi-types.py: Split off generate_struct_fields() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 11:45 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/11] qapi-types.py: Implement 'base' for unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 11:57 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-11 12:46 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/11] qapi-visit.py: Split off generate_visit_struct_fields() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:18 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/11] qapi-visit.py: Implement 'base' for unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:21 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 05/11] qapi: Add visitor for implicit structs Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:41 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-11 12:51 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/11] qapi: Flat unions with arbitrary discriminator Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 14:16 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 07/11] qapi: Add consume argument to qmp_input_get_object() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 19:17 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 08/11] qapi: Anonymous unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 19:47 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12 8:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-12 14:15 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 09/11] Implement qdict_flatten() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 20:25 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-16 8:59 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 10/11] block: Allow "driver" option on the top level Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 22:30 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/11] [WIP] block: Implement 'blockdev-add' QMP command Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 22:45 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12 9:40 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-12 14:27 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12 9:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] qapi changes in preparation for blockdev-add Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-12 10:53 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130716085908.GD2387@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).