From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44194)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1V2MtU-0003ir-La
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:51:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1V2MtR-00019d-VT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:51:52 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12045)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1V2MtR-00019H-OS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:51:49 -0400
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:53:06 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130725145306.GB3758@redhat.com>
References: <87li4v8ktz.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CA+aC4ksBr62tX1aiAXnVueixgyvgFu5uq17TEiD8sZRKD_Tp3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA-aPCF6XNnRF_23mofwQvjtUUNMsv4RaKWLEgp=Q5TJjg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-aPCF6XNnRF_23mofwQvjtUUNMsv4RaKWLEgp=Q5TJjg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vhost acceleration broken?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:12:31PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 July 2013 03:08, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> > We really ought to strongly deprecate -net because it's misleading.
> 
> ...we still need to figure out how -netdev is supposed to
> work for embedded (created-by-default) network devices first.
> 
> -- PMM

I guess it could work just like -net does: assume a default netdev name?