From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51943)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1V2eHN-0001ZH-Kn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 05:25:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1V2eHI-0002Tb-E8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 05:25:41 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22c]:36883)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1V2eHI-0002TK-6V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 05:25:36 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c13so1427633eek.17
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:25:32 +0200
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130726092532.GF31438@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
References: <87li4v8ktz.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CA+aC4ksBr62tX1aiAXnVueixgyvgFu5uq17TEiD8sZRKD_Tp3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA-aPCF6XNnRF_23mofwQvjtUUNMsv4RaKWLEgp=Q5TJjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130725145306.GB3758@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130725145306.GB3758@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vhost acceleration broken?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:53:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:12:31PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 25 July 2013 03:08, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> > > We really ought to strongly deprecate -net because it's misleading.
> > 
> > ...we still need to figure out how -netdev is supposed to
> > work for embedded (created-by-default) network devices first.
> > 
> > -- PMM
> 
> I guess it could work just like -net does: assume a default netdev name?

Sounds like a simple way to solve it, as long as machines use the
standard name(s) for build-in NICs.

Stefan