From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47994)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jcody@redhat.com>) id 1V2l0n-0008Fb-9l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:37:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jcody@redhat.com>) id 1V2l0i-0002eR-Gj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:37:01 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16291)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jcody@redhat.com>) id 1V2l0i-0002eJ-8r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:36:56 -0400
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:36:43 -0400
From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130726163643.GD19811@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1374765505-14356-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<1374765505-14356-7-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<20130726161001.GA28317@localhost.localdomain>
	<51F2A2EE.5040403@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51F2A2EE.5040403@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 06/18] aio: stop using .io_flush()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Ping Fan Liu <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, alex@alex.org.uk

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:25:18PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 26/07/2013 18:10, Jeff Cody ha scritto:
> > +   /* wait until next event that is not aio_notify() */
> > +   while (count > 1) {
> > 
> > This would assume of course that aio_notify() is always first in the
> > list.
> 
> No, you cannot assume that.  Any bdrv can be opened early (with -drive)
> and then associated to an AioContext that is created later (when the
> dataplane thread start).
> 
> Paolo
>

OK, good point, thanks.

Jeff