From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3ncd-0004ah-M4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:36:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3ncT-0003je-9G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:36:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V3ncT-0003jQ-1V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:36:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:36:03 +0200 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20130729133603.GA4467@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <1375067768-11342-1-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130729092213.GA1585@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/5] arm AioContext with its own timer stuff List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Bligh Cc: Kevin Wolf , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Liu Ping Fan , Anthony Liguori , Jan Kiszka , Paolo Bonzini On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:23:52AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: > > > --On 29 July 2013 11:22:13 +0200 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > >The potential for overlap with Alex Bligh's series is large. Can you > >base your patches on his v4? > > > >It seems the difference is that you make clock sources to be available > >globally while Alex's series uses rt_clock (no synchronization > >necessary). > > I should say PingFan has probably paid more attention to thread safety > than me, as my work was intended to be applied before AioContexts were > used by multiple threads. Exactly. That's why I think these patches should be based on your series - they add the thread safety on top. Stefan