From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7SYE-0007PB-4G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:55:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7SY8-0001Pl-57 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:54:58 -0400 Received: from nodalink.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.105.220]:54941 helo=paradis.irqsave.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7SY7-0001PZ-SN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:54:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:56:41 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Canet Message-ID: <20130808155641.GB23734@irqsave.net> References: <1375972194-3090-1-git-send-email-benoit@irqsave.net> <1375972194-3090-4-git-send-email-benoit@irqsave.net> <5203B991.90405@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5203B991.90405@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 3/5] block: Enable the new throttling code in the block layer. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com > Also, it would be better to have a workaround for this. Perhaps we > could simply make the default value of max nonzero? In the old > throttling code the slice time is 0.1s, so perhaps we could see what > happens with max=3D0.1*avg. This gives correct results with cfg with some little auto compensated osc= illations. I will definitelly drop the bogus comment. Best regards Beno=EEt