From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:21:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9BA7zfaO1J5zVaEcG-AgOo6dyiew08-o2eObuBe-KWig@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:49:54PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 August 2013 21:06, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:33:28PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> /* Slot to IRQ mapping for RealView EB and PB1176 backplane
> >> * name slot IntA IntB IntC IntD
> >> * A 31 IRQ50 IRQ51 IRQ48 IRQ49
> >> * B 30 IRQ49 IRQ50 IRQ51 IRQ48
> >> * C 29 IRQ48 IRQ49 IRQ50 IRQ51
> >> * Slot C is for the host bridge; A and B the peripherals.
> >> * Our output irqs 0..3 correspond to the baseboard's 48..51.
> >> */
> >>
> >> ie IRQ48 == board's PCI0 == slot C connector A6 (IntA) == PCI_nINTB
> >> == Slot B connector B8 (IntD) == Slot A connector A7 (IntC).
> >>
> >> and so on round.
> >>
> >> The 926's routing is one extra round of swizzling because the
> >> board itself connects FPGA P_nINTA to its edge connector's
> >> INTB (B7) pin rather than INTA (A6) as the EB/1176 do.
> >> (This isn't even hinted at in the documentation, you need to
> >> either experiment or look at the 926 board schematic.)
> >
> > Okay, so the above just adds to the confusion, because you appear to be
> > mistaking "slot" for the AD signal which the IDSEL pin is connected to.
>
> The board TRM:
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dui0411d/Cacdijji.html
> says that "slot position" and "AD signal connected to IDSEL"
> are the same thing:
That's realview, not versatile. Are you saying that both are exactly
the same wrt this?
> I don't currently have the h/w set up, but digging in my email
> archives, when we were running the kernel on the real PB926
> h/w and backplane it was indeed reporting the PCI core (ie
> "slot C") as 29, and the other two as 30 and 31:
> [ 128.920150] PCI core found (slot 29)
> [ 128.920875] pci 0000:00:1f.0: reg 10: [io 0x0af0-0x0aff]
> [ 128.920958] pci 0000:00:1f.0: reg 14: [io 0x0a70-0x0a7f]
> [ 128.921032] pci 0000:00:1f.0: reg 18: [io 0x01f0-0x01ff]
> [ 128.921103] pci 0000:00:1f.0: reg 1c: [io 0x0170-0x017f]
> [ 128.921173] pci 0000:00:1f.0: reg 20: [io 0xcc00-0xcc1f]
> [ 128.921244] pci 0000:00:1f.0: reg 24: [io 0x8c00-0x8cff]
> [ 128.921320] pci 0000:00:1f.0: reg 30: [mem 0xffff0000-0xffffffff pref]
With realview or versatile?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-12 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5207B3C3.9080508@roeck-us.net>
[not found] ` <20130811220450.GY23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-12 0:40 ` [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] memory reads and writes Herbei Dacian
2013-08-12 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 19:02 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 20:58 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).