From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:04:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:12:50PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On this point, yes. Equivalent bit from the PB926 TRM:
> > http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dui0224i/Cacdijji.html
> >
> > (There are differences between the PCI controllers on
> > the different boards. Differences I know of are:
> > * size of the three memory mapped regions
> > * whether the top bits of the PCI address come from the top
> > or bottom of the IMAP* registers
> > I believe (based on some experimentation and an educated guess)
> > that these both changed at the same point, but some of the board
> > TRMs claim to be part one way part the other, presumably due to
> > copy and paste error. In particular PB1176's TRM has a mangled
> > description of the IMAP* registers which didn't match what the
> > h/w actually did in my testing.)
>
> Bah, updated TRMs since my version.
>
> Right, so if I've traced everything correctly, this should work:
>
> /*
> * Slot INTA INTB INTC INTD
> * 31 PCI1 PCI2 PCI3 PCI0
> * 30 PCI0 PCI1 PCI2 PCI3
> * 29 PCI3 PCI0 PCI1 PCI2
> */
> return IRQ_SIC_PCI0 + ((slot + 2 + pin - 1) & 3);
>
I tried the above with qemu 1.5.2. Success!
Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
or do we need a test on real hardware ?
Thanks,
Guenter
---
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
index e92e5e0..53b4208 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
@@ -333,7 +333,11 @@ static int __init versatile_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
* 26 1 IRQ_SIC_PCI2
* 27 1 IRQ_SIC_PCI3
*/
+#if 0
irq = IRQ_SIC_PCI0 + ((slot - 24 + pin - 1) & 3);
+#else
+ irq = IRQ_SIC_PCI0 + ((slot + 2 + pin - 1) & 3);
+#endif
return irq;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-12 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5207B3C3.9080508@roeck-us.net>
[not found] ` <20130811220450.GY23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-12 0:40 ` [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-08-14 10:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:44 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:56 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] memory reads and writes Herbei Dacian
2013-08-12 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 8:37 ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13 9:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 16:45 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 21:49 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:23 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 23:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 19:02 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 20:58 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).