From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9D84-0004Q8-LR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:51:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9D7z-0001K2-SV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:51:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9D7z-0001Jn-Km for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:51:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:21:00 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20130813115100.GA32712@grmbl.mre> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] Chardev bugs that need attention List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu list Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Gerd Hoffmann , Anthony Liguori Hello, There are a few bugs for chardev reported by Red Hat and IBM QE teams. I haven't been able to get to them in a while, and will note them down here for whoever wishes to tackle them. 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808295 There is a reproducer script here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=573982 The backtrace with upstream qemu sources is at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808295#c40 and also at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=750770 This is caused due to a SIGPIPE. 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985205 Reproduction steps and backtrace mentioned in the bug comment 0. This looks like a stale watch remaining behind when a virtio-serial port is unplugged, but the chardev exists. 3. http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/ChardevFlowControl#Known_bugs Reproduction steps are mentioned there. This is about qemu not catching -EPIPE for short-lived guest processes and disconnected host chardevs. I will report any progress to the referenced bugzillas and this thread so that people don't waste time looking at stale stuff. Thanks, Amit