From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9J80-0000To-K8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:15:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9J7u-0001q5-8a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:15:32 -0400 Received: from nodalink.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.105.220]:56611 helo=paradis.irqsave.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9J7t-0001oR-UA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:15:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:17:13 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Canet Message-ID: <20130813181713.GA5204@irqsave.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] KVM guest cpu L3 cache and cpufreq List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com Hi, I noticed that the l3 cache size of a guest /proc/cpuinfo is not the same= as the l3 cache size of the host. I did not found any references to this in the qemu and KVM code. Is the size of the guest L3 cache fixed in hardware ? Can a patch be written to set it ? Similarly I noticed that the frequency in the guest was not reflecting th= e frequency scaling of the host. Could anything be done for this ?=20 Best regards Beno=EEt