From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35528)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <linux+qemu-devel=nongnu.org@arm.linux.org.uk>)
	id 1V9YPj-000413-Th
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:34:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <linux+qemu-devel=nongnu.org@arm.linux.org.uk>)
	id 1V9YPf-0001hC-4R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:34:51 -0400
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda::1]:47140)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <linux+qemu-devel=nongnu.org@arm.linux.org.uk>)
	id 1V9YPe-0001g4-Nt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:34:47 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:33:46 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20130814103346.GN23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <52082EF8.10005@roeck-us.net>
	<CAFEAcA94ygwRPSsfxs3DvOcTZbdafLiEHys94FG4aXUx+A1t=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130812164548.GE23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAFEAcA97PuORg920f-A_8rvCgBq=k5Y=0W6m2Nv8nnzjY19Utg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130812200628.GG23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAFEAcA9BA7zfaO1J5zVaEcG-AgOo6dyiew08-o2eObuBe-KWig@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130812212149.GH23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<CAFEAcA_0kzS=Z5oTxrr=B74wjf1x=M6dXwH7Fcgf77Pca90Gjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130812221250.GI23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130812230408.GA4420@roeck-us.net>
Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:04:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hacked diff is below. Can I write that up as clean patch and submit it,
> or do we need a test on real hardware ?

Well, if we want to ensure that it is really correct, the sensible thing
to do is to try it on real hardware, otherwise we're risking yet another
change to this.

Earlier in this thread, some people said that they have the hardware, so
it shouldn't be that difficult to get it tested on real stuff.