qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:39:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130815183904.GA4067@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_MyJPwo6Gd_dxeWM5q5-7MYqR6-rrePusFzYaGGckWJQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 07:05:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 August 2013 18:54, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 05:45:42PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 13 August 2013 04:40, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >> > Patch tested and working with qemu 1.5.2, using the configuration file
> >> > from the yocto project. Patch applied on top of kernel version 3.11-rc5.
> >>
> >> OK, I tested this on PB926+PCI backplane hardware, and it is
> >> definitely better than current mainline, in that the test USB
> >> card that I have no longer causes the kernel to generate this sort of
> >> backtrace:
> >>
> > Do you mean my patch fixes the traceback below as a side effect ?
> > Would be great ... it would be one more reason to get it applied.
> 
> Yes, exactly -- the kernel currently has the wrong irq mapping,
> which causes the traceback (ie h/w asserts irq 93 but the kernel
> is listening on something else). That the patch fixes this confirms
> that it is the behaviour of hardware as well as of QEMU.
> 
> >> However it still doesn't seem to reliably detect the USB harddisk
> >> plugged into the card, so I think there may be further issues, possibly
> >> some subset of those Arnd identified and fixed with this patch:
> >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/93397
> >>
> > Does it get better if you apply Arnd's patch ?
> 
> Arnd's patch is ancient and won't apply as is (due to intervening
> changes and also because some of the things it fixes were fixed
> in later patches); I'm currently trying to extract the relevant parts.
> 
> If you want you can confirm that I/O port PCI access is broken on
> QEMU too -- disable CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_MMIO so
> the driver uses PCI IO rather than MMIO and you'll see QEMU's
> SCSI device doesn't work any more.
> 
> >> so I'd like to continue testing.
> >>
> >> The other thing this patch should (IMHO) have is the
> >> line in pci_versatile_setup() which tells QEMU that the
> >> kernel really does expect hardware-like behaviour:
> 
> >> (Without this line QEMU will guess whether the kernel is broken
> >> or not and will get it right most but not necessarily all of the time.)
> >>
> > Might make sense, but I think it should be a separate patch.
> 
> It needs to go in the same patch, because a kernel with the fixed
> irq remapping must also tell QEMU it is fixed; if you split the
> two then at the point between the two patches the kernel is
> broken for bisection purposes.
> 
> > If I understand correctly, my patch fixes the SCSI problem.
> > Is that correct ? If so, can we get it applied to mainline ?
> 
> I'd rather get to a point where I have the hardware definitely
> completely working first. There's no real hurry, this has been
> broken for months and months.
> 
Ok with me, if it doesn't get lost.

Until it gets fixed, arm status on 3.10 kernels will show as "failed"
for qemu test runs.

Thanks,
Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-15 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5207B3C3.9080508@roeck-us.net>
     [not found] ` <20130811220450.GY23006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-12  0:40   ` [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 16:24     ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 16:45       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 17:33         ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 20:06           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 20:49             ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 21:21               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 21:36                 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-12 22:12                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-12 22:48                     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 23:04                     ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 10:33                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:44                         ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 12:49                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-14 12:56                             ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-14 14:41                           ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-14 15:26                             ` [Qemu-devel] memory reads and writes Herbei Dacian
2013-08-12 17:48         ` [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+ Peter Maydell
2013-08-13  8:37         ` Rob Landley
2013-08-13  9:12           ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-13 11:30           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-13  3:40       ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 16:45         ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 17:54           ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 18:05             ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 18:39               ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-08-15 20:50               ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 21:49                 ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 22:18                   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-15 22:23                     ` Peter Maydell
2013-08-15 23:25                       ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-19 15:26                       ` Guenter Roeck
2013-08-12 19:02     ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-08-12 20:58       ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130815183904.GA4067@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).