From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBqh-0007VA-3o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:05:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBqb-0004EY-45 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:05:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VCBqa-0004EG-Rq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:05:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:07:08 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20130821170707.GA12410@redhat.com> References: <1377103396-24307-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1377103396-24307-4-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20130821170120.GA12305@redhat.com> <5214F273.9060806@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5214F273.9060806@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: pkrempa@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, rhod@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 07:01:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/08/2013 19:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > >> > The pvpanic situation is already messed up enough. Let us give our > >> > libvirt friends an easy indication that we have untied our side. > >> > > >> > Not-yet-signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > >> > ... because we first have to determine how to expose the device's existence > >> > in the ACPI tables or in fw_cfg. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > > So it's isa-pvpanic meaning "I-am-sure-this-is-the-last-bug-pvpanic" > > More like "we tested pvpanic for more than 2 weeks and did not find > anything that's utterly broken in the design". > > And more practically "you are sure there are no traces of builtin > pvpanic; also, panicked state is reversible". > > Paolo isa-pvpanic does not look like a sane way to say that. NACK > > If we feel there's need to give libvirt a way to do > > introspection into QEMU bugs, let's architect one. > > Randomly renaming devices in the vain hope it's > > the last major bug is not it.