From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56806)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1VHCsf-0004hr-VB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:12:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1VHCsb-0002P8-3U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:12:21 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63017)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1VHCsa-0002Or-S2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:12:17 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:12:02 -0400
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130904091202.1b852e6e@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <52272FD1.5030906@suse.de>
References: <1375366359-11553-1-git-send-email-jjherne@us.ibm.com>
	<52272B78.3010804@suse.de> <20130904085647.03532941@redhat.com>
	<52272FD1.5030906@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?UTF-8?B?RsOkcmJlcg==?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com, imammedo@redhat.com

On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:04:17 +0200
Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:

> Am 04.09.2013 14:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:45:44 +0200
> > Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> >=20
> >> For the HMP patch I am waiting on feedback from Igor once he returns
> >> from his vacation and, if there are no objections, would like to see
> >> that patch go through Luiz' queue since unrelated to s390x.
> >=20
> > I don't remember seeing that patch, I was CC'ed?

It should be good then :)

>=20
> Originally no, but you added a Reviewed-by after I CC'ed you. :)
>=20
> Apart from me not being familiar with the HMP infrastructure, I was
> wondering if there was a reason why this wasn't done from the start.
>=20
> So we don't have some only-new-QMP-commands policy

Not sure what you meant, but what is usually not accepted are
new HMP-only commands.

> and people are
> encouraged to implement an HMP command when they do a QMP command?

If the new command makes sense in HMP, yes they're.