From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42823) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHHaI-0003c2-4X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:13:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHHaB-0002lL-VC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:13:42 -0400 Received: from nodalink.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.105.220]:60106 helo=paradis.irqsave.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHHaB-0002kU-Ml for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:13:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:15:36 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Canet Message-ID: <20130904181535.GA5073@irqsave.net> References: <20130903162449.GF5285@irqsave.net> <20130904082958.GB8031@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130904082958.GB8031@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Block Filters List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Canet , kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com > Propagate operations like snapshot down the tree. block.c is designed > for bs->file/bs->backing_hd kind of BlockDrivers, perhaps it needs to > become a bit more generic to support other types of BlockDrivers > properly. Shouldn't bs->backing_hd become bs->children[0] and bs->file stay the sam= e ? Best regards Beno=EEt