From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJ2q2-00018e-Kt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:53:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJ2px-0003GP-RS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:53:14 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([2001:470:1f0b:4a8::1]:37977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJ2px-0003GJ-KM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:53:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:53:02 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno Message-ID: <20130909145302.GB4966@ohm.aurel32.net> References: <1378327754-8415-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <52279D6A.6040302@weilnetz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52279D6A.6040302@weilnetz.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tci: Add implementation of rotl_i64, rotr_i64 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: Richard Henderson , qemu-stable@nongnu.org, qemu-devel On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:51:54PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 04.09.2013 22:49, schrieb Stefan Weil: > > It is used by qemu-ppc64 when running Debian's busybox-static. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil > > --- > > > > This patch is also useful for QEMU 1.6. > > ... so I should have added qemu-stable. Done now. > Why is it needed for qemu-stable? It should only improve performance, as these two ops are not mandatory ops. In general I don't think we should have performance improvements in a stable minor release (unless of course it's a big regression from previous). -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net