From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34452) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJRiu-0003By-Vc for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:27:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJRip-0005WL-TA for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:27:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJRip-0005VE-K3 for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:27:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:29:34 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20130910172934.GB3913@redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Q35 FreeBSD install status List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bret Ketchum Cc: "Qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kraxel@redhat.com" On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:16:35PM +0000, Bret Ketchum wrote: > =20 >=20 > I=E2=80=99m looking for some guidance with regards to constructing = a VM using a > later version of FreeBSD. In reference to a qemu-devel posting: >=20 > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-08/msg03329.html >=20 > I reran with both 1.6.0.rc3 and 1.6.50 the q35 FreeBSD tests with 9= .0, 9.1 > and 10-CURRENT using the following command line: >=20 > qemu-kvm \ >=20 > -hda /home/ehv/images/126802.img -enable-kvm -m 1G -monitor stdio -M= q35 \ > -vnc 127.0.0.1:1 -vga cirrus -monitor stdio \ > -cdrom /home/ehv/images/FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso -boot or= der=3Dd >=20 > Note the command line parameter changes necessary for the current versi= ons of > qemu. I'm running this on a Fedora 17/3.4.4 host and I've tried specify= ing > SeaBios 1.7.3 with -bios and -acpitable command line options. Note also= that > both the ide and ahci tests (pc-i440fx-1.6) worked as advertised on thi= s host. > My trouble is that the bios does not see either the HDD image nor the c= drom. >=20 > My questions are am I correct to expect the aforementioned q35 test > (specifically the command line) to work? Am I missing something obvious= ? Is > there something to look? >=20 > Any insight will be appreciated. Thanks. >=20 > =20 >=20 > Bret >=20 > =20 -cdrom doesn't work with ahci. there's a new flag that replaces it, I keep forgetting what it is. Will look it up tomorrow if no one beats me to it. --=20 MST