From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKXZU-00041U-4X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:54:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKXZN-0007cO-7b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:54:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKXZM-0007cJ-Vf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:54:13 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8DHsCd3019775 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:54:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:54:10 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20130913135410.7cf351f3@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5230FC7E.3060609@redhat.com> References: <1378932737-13422-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1378932737-13422-6-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <5230FC7E.3060609@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] QMP: Update qmp-spec.txt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:27:58 -0600 Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/11/2013 02:52 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > Simplify the text, fix some of the examples. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino > > --- > > docs/qmp/qmp-spec.txt | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > > > > diff --git a/docs/qmp/qmp-spec.txt b/docs/qmp/qmp-spec.txt > > index a277896..22568c6 100644 > > --- a/docs/qmp/qmp-spec.txt > > +++ b/docs/qmp/qmp-spec.txt > > @@ -1,21 +1,17 @@ > > - QEMU Monitor Protocol Specification - Version 0.1 > > + QEMU Machine Protocol Specification > > Do we want a protocol version number? I guess if we ever add > capabilities, we can worry about it then. Yes, but I don't think we want it. This is the sole place where a version number appears and it's quite meaningless. > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake >