Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 5/8] module: implement module loading

["Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:09:47PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/09/2013 11:51, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> > On Mon, 09/16 11:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 16/09/2013 10:59, Daniel P. Berrange ha scritto:
> >>>> The init function of dynamic module is no longer with
> >>>> __attribute__((constructor)) as static linked version, and need to be
> >>>> explicitly called once loaded. The function name is mangled with per
> >>>> configure fingerprint as:
> >>>>
> >>>>     init_$(date +%s$$$RANDOM)
> >>
> >> Does this work for a module that calls module_init multiple times?
> >
> > Why should a module calls module_init, instead of the main function?
> 
> I think you mean "why should a module calls register_module_init", and I
> agree that with this patch a module will not call register_module_init.
> 
> But a module is still using the module_init macro.
> 
> With this patch, a module will not be able to use the module_init macro
> twice.  I am not sure this is an acceptable limitation, especially if we
> do not have a dependency system within modules and/or load them with
> G_MODULE_LOCAL/RTLD_LOCAL.

Why would a module ever want to use the module_init macro twice ? IIUC
this function is supposed todo one-time initialization work for the .so
module. Surely any place where a module wanted to use module_init twice
could be solved by having that module put all its init logic into just
one function. So I'm not sure I see where the problem is.

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|