From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VLjRp-00065d-RI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:47:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VLjRj-0002UC-T5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:47:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9220) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VLjRj-0002S4-LL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:47:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:47:01 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20130917004701.GA3362@T430s.nay.redhat.com> References: <1379314227-8855-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1379314227-8855-6-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <20130916085902.GA6005@redhat.com> <20130916092852.GA25678@T430s.nay.redhat.com> <52378350.1020202@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52378350.1020202@twiddle.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 5/8] module: implement module loading Reply-To: famz@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, mjt@tls.msk.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex@alex.org.uk, pbonzini@redhat.com, vilanova@ac.upc.edu On Mon, 09/16 15:16, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/16/2013 02:28 AM, Fam Zheng wrote: > > What's the disadvantage of this, and why are separate lists better? > > You're performing useless work, making the code more confusing in the process. > How can it not be better to have separate lists? > > Because it's about adding more code in Makefile to separate them and adding more code here to define and use multiple lists. I am not sure it's much more readable than this, but it's really non critical question, let me first try to do it. Thanks, Fam