From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VO4le-00033m-QW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:57:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VO4lT-0002ye-2l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:57:30 -0400 Received: from afflict.kos.to ([92.243.29.197]:48603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VO4lS-0002yO-SR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:57:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:57:17 +0300 From: Riku Voipio Message-ID: <20130923115717.GA14290@afflict.kos.to> References: <1378485978-32108-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <522A0FC9.6090205@weilnetz.de> <523B3507.8040301@weilnetz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <523B3507.8040301@weilnetz.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Fix wrong use of stat instead of stat64 for sparc64 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel , Richard Henderson On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 07:31:51PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote: > Ping? Are there any more opinions how qemu-sparc64 should be fixed? > Should we choose Peter's approach (which is good, but with a > higher risk than my patch)? I've included it now in my qeu, since it fixes qemu-sparc64 in my smoketest and causes seemingly no regressions on other platforms. Riku