From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Autefage <1228285@bugs.launchpad.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1228285] [NEW] e1000 nic TCP performances
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:43:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130923134319.GB10376@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130920172123.20190.55970.malonedeb@wampee.canonical.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 05:21:23PM -0000, Vincent Autefage wrote:
> Here is the context :
>
> $ qemu -name A -m 1024 -net nic vlan=0,model=e1000 -net socket,vlan=0,listen=127.0.0.1:7000
> $ qemu -name B -m 1024 -net nic vlan=0,model=e1000 -net socket,vlan=0,connect=127.0.0.1:7000
>
> The bandwidth is really tiny :
>
> . Iperf3 reports about 30 Mb/sec
> . NetPerf reports about 50 Mb/sec
>
>
> With UDP sockets, there is no problem at all :
>
> . Iperf3 reports about 1 Gb/sec
> . NetPerf reports about 950 Mb/sec
>
>
> I've noticed this fact only with the e1000 NIC, not with others (rtl8139,virtio, etc.)
> I've used the main GIT version of QEMU.
It's interesting that you see good performance over -netdev socket TCP
with the other NIC models.
I don't know what the issue would be, you'll probably need to dig
further to discover the problem. Using wireshark might be a good start.
Try to figure out where the delay is incurred and then instrument that
code to find out the cause.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-20 17:21 [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1228285] [NEW] e1000 nic TCP performances Vincent Autefage
2013-09-23 13:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2018-04-18 15:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1228285] " Thomas Huth
2018-06-18 4:17 ` Launchpad Bug Tracker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130923134319.GB10376@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=1228285@bugs.launchpad.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).