From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35128)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1VP6Vx-000878-PP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 04:01:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1VP6Vp-0004vs-C7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 04:01:33 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::229]:40785)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1VP6Vp-0004vl-5C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 04:01:25 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d17so345835eek.0
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:01:21 +0200
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130926080121.GD24531@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
References: <1380101319-29435-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<52431092.7040109@polymtl.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52431092.7040109@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [lttng-dev] [PATCH] trace: drop LTTng Userspace
	Tracer backend
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Mohamad Gebai <mohamad.gebai@polymtl.ca>
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs?= Vilanova <vilanova@ac.upc.edu>

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:34:26PM -0400, Mohamad Gebai wrote:
> I am actually using LTTng 2.x as a backend for UST to do some
> performance analysis and latency investigation using Qemu/KVM. I
> already have all the patches ready to replace the old 0.x interface,
> and I am preparing them for the merge upstream.

Excellent, I was hoping to find someone who wants to update the code.

Do you need the old 0.x code for your patches or is it cleaner if we
apply my patch to drop that first?  I guess you pretty much rewrote
the ./configure and tracetool pieces...

Stefan