From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51202)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1VSt1X-0008Mh-Rf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:25:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1VSt1R-0000wC-Q6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:25:47 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12154)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1VSt1R-0000vt-I5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:25:41 -0400
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r96IPd45004717
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 14:25:40 -0400
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 21:28:06 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20131006182806.GA16531@redhat.com>
References: <1380807975-13266-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<20131003135404.GA1267@redhat.com> <524D9426.20707@redhat.com>
	<20131003165417.GA4616@redhat.com> <524DA0F6.3050007@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <524DA0F6.3050007@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] qdev: switch reset to post-order,
	clean up PCI reset
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:53:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/10/2013 18:54, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > > For each PCI device I tried creating a VM with an instance of it (a few
> > > devices at a time), and did VM resets.  Earlier versions were tested by
> > > the guy who reported the SCSI problems.
> > 
> > x86 kvm only?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Paolo

Hmm, I'm not sure that's enough for this kind of change.