From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVxDO-00019S-MT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 01:30:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVxDG-0006Sb-DD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 01:30:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VVxDG-0006SR-0A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 01:30:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:33:04 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20131015053304.GA16360@redhat.com> References: <1381762577-12526-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <87r4bnlbj6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r4bnlbj6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/43] pci, pc, acpi fixes, enhancements List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, imammedo@redhat.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:42:37PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote: > This is a huge series and I still am not convinced this is the right > path forward. Also, this kind of response is quite unexpected after this direction was discussed multiple times and largely agreed upon on the phone meeting, and after multiple people spent lots of time discussing and testing this on list. -- MST