From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VW3s6-0003BA-9p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:37:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VW3s0-00057D-8L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:37:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VW3s0-000574-0X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:37:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:36:56 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20131015143656.44cbe32a@nial.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1381828476.3709.23.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> References: <20131013155920.GC11448@redhat.com> <20131013182328.1e735051@thinkpad> <20131013164609.GA11934@redhat.com> <20131013193319.54578867@thinkpad> <20131013202847.GB12354@redhat.com> <20131014122726.7277bac0@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <20131014110012.GE30954@redhat.com> <1381752983.30262.32.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <20131014123854.GB31534@redhat.com> <1381755885.30262.58.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <20131014140047.GA5106@redhat.com> <1381824061.3709.20.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <20131015110548.167dce45@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <1381828476.3709.23.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v2] map 64-bit PCI BARs at location provided by emulator List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:14:36 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > > What is the state of the qemu side patches btw? > > I've them ready but they conflict with you 1Tb in e820 RFC, > > I can post relevant patches as soon as we agree on this topic. > > May I pick up your patch and post it along with pcimem64-start patches? > > Yes, makes sense it just pick it into the series. it conflicted with one of memory hotplug patches and since I'm not posting whole series there is no need to resubmit it. > cheers, > Gerd > > >