From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43701) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbW2d-0000xg-Ge for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:42:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbW2U-0006hm-ME for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:42:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbW2U-0006h0-Du for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:42:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:29:55 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20131030142955.2fc3adcc@nial.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20131029185242.GC20848@redhat.com> References: <1383051455-28188-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20131029151047.GA20242@redhat.com> <20131029162825.6fe5a0ae@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <20131029185242.GC20848@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v2] pc: inform SeaBIOS where 64-bit PCI hole begins List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, kraxel@redhat.com, aliguori@amazon.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:52:42 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:28:25PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:10:47 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:57:33PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > * simplify PCI address space mapping into system address space, > > > > replacing code duplication in piix/q53 PCs with a helper function > > > > > > > > * add fw_cfg 'etc/pcimem64-minimum-address' to allow QEMU reserve > > > > additional address space before 64-bit PCI hole. Which will be > > > > need for reserving memory hotplug region in highmem. > > > > SeaBIOS counterpart: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/283623/ > > > > > > I'd like to see if we can figure out the migration issue with > > > memory layout. > > It seems that there isn't migration issue here. > > Hmm earlier you thought there was - it's ok now? You've probably missed my reply http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg199586.html it was error it test environment.