From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbq6n-000233-SM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:08:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbq6f-0007Lm-Tc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:08:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vbmzp-000404-TS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:48:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:48:44 +0200 From: Gleb Natapov Message-ID: <20131031074844.GO4651@redhat.com> References: <1381949935-8692-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20131030230618.GA5961@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131030230618.GA5961@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] import kvm-unittest in QEMU source tree List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrew Jones Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , "Michael S. Tsirkin" On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:06:19PM -0700, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:03:37PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > This simply imports kvm-unittest git into qemu source tree. > > > > We can next work on making make check run it > > automatically. > > > > Squashed 'kvm-unittest/' content from commit 2bc0e29 > > > > git-subtree-dir: kvm-unittest > > git-subtree-split: 2bc0e29ee4447bebcd3b90053881f59265306adc > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > > > --- > > > > Gleb, Paolo, any objections to this? I really want a small guest for > > running ACPI tests during make check, and kvm-unittest seems to fit the > > bill. > > > > Ability to test e.g. PCI with this in-tree would be very benefitial. > > > > Sorry for slow reply, I just noticed this mail now. > > So far qemu is a dependency for kvm-unit-tests (both x86 and arm use it), > but at some point that could change (if another arch doesn't want to use > qemu). So if that happens, then it won't make much sense for the tests to > live in qemu. Thus I'm not 100% in favor of moving them. However, if the > consensus is to move them, then I have two comments on this patch. > Do not worry, we are far from such consensus :) > 1) There are a couple pendings patches on the kvm list that tidy up the > kvm-unit-tests repo - removing lots of the files. That should be > committed first to avoid importing a bunch of files right before deleting > them. > > 2) The name shouldn't change from kvm-unit-tests to kvm-unittest. > > drew -- Gleb.