From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: marcel.a@redhat.com, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] BUG: QEMU aborts when setting breakpoint in gdb (bisected)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 19:48:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131106174834.GA11767@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <527A7EDE.3060409@redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:39:42PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/11/2013 17:22, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> > 1. Run qemu with gdb server support
> >
> > # qemu [...] -s -S
> >
> > 2. Connect gdb and try to set a breakpoint
> >
> > $ gdb /path/to/vmlinux
> > (gdb) target remote:1234
> > (gdb) b secondary_startup_64
>
> (Note that this doesn't make much sense until the kernel has been loaded
> into memory. You probably want hbreak instead).
>
> > 3. On qemu terminal
> >
> > qemu-qmp: /home/lcapitulino/work/src/upstream/qmp-unstable/include/qemu/int128.h:22: int128_get64: Assertion `!a.hi' failed.
> > Aborted (core dumped)
> >
> > According to bisect the culprit is:
> >
> > commit a53ae8e934cd54686875b5bcfc2f434244ee55d6
> > Author: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
> > Date: Mon Sep 16 11:21:16 2013 +0300
> >
> > hw/pci: partially handle pci master abort
>
> I couldn't get quite the same reproducer, mine was:
>
> $ gdb
> (gdb) set arch i386:x86-64
> The target architecture is assumed to be i386:x86-64
> (gdb) target remote localhost:1234
> Remote debugging using localhost:1234
> <bang>
>
> The problem is that gdb attempts to read a few bytes from address
> 0xffffffffffffffe6 to 0xffffffffffffffff inclusive.
>
> The region it gets is the (newly introduced) master abort region, which
> is as big as the PCI address space (see pci_bus_init). Due to a typo
> that's only 2^63-1, not 2^64. But we get it anyway because
> phys_page_find ignores the upper bits of the physical address. In
> address_space_translate_internal then
>
> diff = int128_sub(section->mr->size, int128_make64(addr));
> *plen = int128_get64(int128_min(diff, int128_make64(*plen)));
>
> diff becomes negative, and int128_get64 booms.
>
> Will send as a proper patch tomorrow... can you give your Tested-by?
This just makes the symproms go away.
The real bug is exec ignores high address bits during page
lookups. It should fail on invalid address not access
a random page.
I'll send a patch.
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> index b3d94bd..68901c3 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void pc_init1(QEMUMachineInitArgs *args,
>
> if (pci_enabled) {
> pci_memory = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> - memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", INT64_MAX);
> + memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", UINT64_MAX);
> rom_memory = pci_memory;
> } else {
> pci_memory = NULL;
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_q35.c b/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> index 2e315f7..c9a03fc 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_q35.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void pc_q35_init(QEMUMachineInitArgs *args)
> /* pci enabled */
> if (pci_enabled) {
> pci_memory = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> - memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", INT64_MAX);
> + memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", UINT64_MAX);
> rom_memory = pci_memory;
> } else {
> pci_memory = NULL;
>
This is also ugly and will be broken on actual 64 bit systems
(not x86). Generally INT64_MAX does not make sense at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 16:22 [Qemu-devel] BUG: QEMU aborts when setting breakpoint in gdb (bisected) Luiz Capitulino
2013-11-06 16:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-06 16:29 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-11-06 16:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-06 16:30 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2013-11-06 17:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-06 17:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-11-06 17:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-06 18:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-06 21:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-06 21:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-06 18:36 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-11-06 21:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131106174834.GA11767@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).