From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjPac-0007ha-9i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 03:26:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjPaW-00075q-AK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 03:26:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VjPaW-00075k-2B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 03:26:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:29:09 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20131121082909.GB20073@redhat.com> References: <1385001528-12003-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1385001528-12003-17-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20131121071418.GB19703@redhat.com> <20131121081222.GG24886@G08FNSTD100614.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> <528DC1E5.8090408@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <528DC1E5.8090408@cn.fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 16/27] acpi: ich9: allow guest to clear SCI rised by GPE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Li Guang Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, aliguori@amazon.com, marcel.a@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hu Tao , stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjt@tls.msk.ru, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, armbru@redhat.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, quintela@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov , pbonzini@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, afaerber@suse.de On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:18:45PM +0800, Li Guang wrote: > Hu Tao wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:14:18AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:38:37AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > >>>it fixes IRQ storm since guest isn't able to lower SCI IRQ > >>>after it has been handled when it clears GPE event. > >>> > >>>Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov > >>The storm is only on memory hotplug right? > >IIRC, it happens on cpu hotplug, too. > > > > > > > :-), that made remember EC implementation, > with EC, SCI will be safer, I think. Hmm you are saying let's use EC for memory hotplug?