From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [for-1.7] hw/i386/acpi-build.c vs glib-2.12
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:15:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131121091506.GA22462@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528A7D64.4020908@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:49:40AM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c:294:5: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘g_string_vprintf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> g_string_vprintf(s, format, args);
>
> Introduced in 2.14.
>
>
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c:427:5: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘g_array_get_element_size’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> return table->len * g_array_get_element_size(table);
>
> Introduced in 2.22.
>
>
> Our (self-)documented minimums are
>
> if test "$mingw32" = yes; then
> # g_poll is required in order to integrate with the glib main loop.
> glib_req_ver=2.20
> else
> glib_req_ver=2.12
> fi
>
>
> Within unix variants at least, vs(n)printf is likely to be much more portable
> than the glib function. I suspect MinGW has it as well, though I've not checked.
>
> As for g_array_get_element_size, aren't all of your tables element size 1?
> That's all I can see from acpi_build_tables_init, though I admit to not digging
> deeper.
>
>
>
> r~
Can you please confirm this fixes the issue for you?
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 486e705..97e0fba 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -287,14 +287,17 @@ static inline void build_append_array(GArray *array, GArray *val)
static void build_append_nameseg(GArray *array, const char *format, ...)
{
- GString *s = g_string_new("");
+ /* It would be nicer to use g_string_vprintf but it's only there in 2.22 */
+ char s[] = "XXXX";
+ int len;
va_list args;
va_start(args, format);
g_string_vprintf(s, format, args);
+ len = vsnprintf(s, sizeof s, format, args);
va_end(args);
- assert(s->len == 4);
+ assert(len == 4);
g_array_append_vals(array, s->str, s->len);
g_string_free(s, true);
}
@@ -424,7 +427,10 @@ static inline void *acpi_data_push(GArray *table_data, unsigned size)
static unsigned acpi_data_len(GArray *table)
{
- return table->len * g_array_get_element_size(table);
+#if GLIB_CHECK_VERSION(2, 14, 0)
+ assert(g_array_get_element_size(table) == 1);
+#endif
+ return table->len;
}
static void acpi_align_size(GArray *blob, unsigned align)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-21 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-18 20:49 [Qemu-devel] [for-1.7] hw/i386/acpi-build.c vs glib-2.12 Richard Henderson
2013-11-18 22:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-11-21 9:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-11-21 10:09 ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-21 11:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131121091506.GA22462@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).